I spotted a reference to the Roundtable Responsible Soy (RTRS) in a recent news item about Sustainable Soy and Food Waste Drive Progress in Netherlands: "Only soy meeting Roundtable Responsible Soy (RTRS) criteria is now being imported as part of the nation’s annual 300,000 tonne requirement, as of 1 January 2015, says the Dutch Dairy Association (NZO)."
The RTRS Standard for Responsible Soy Production is available
as a pdf and contains several principles for sustainable practice. Here are the
specific principles and practices that are relevant to biodiversity:
Principle 4: Environmental Responsibility
4.4 Expansion of soy cultivation is responsible.
Note: This criterion will be revised after June 2012 if RTRS-approved maps and system are not available.
Principle 4: Environmental Responsibility
4.4 Expansion of soy cultivation is responsible.
Note: This criterion will be revised after June 2012 if RTRS-approved maps and system are not available.
4.4.1 After May 2009 expansion for soy cultivation has not taken place on
land cleared of native habitat except under the following conditions:
4.4.1.1 It is in line with an RTRS-approved map and system (see Annex 4.)
or
4.4.1.2 Where no RTRS-approved map and system is available:
a) Any area already cleared for agriculture or pasture before May 2009
and used for agriculture or pasture within the past 12 years can be used for soy
expansion, unless regenerated vegetation has reached the definition of native
forest (see glossary).
b) There is no expansion in native forests (see glossary)
c) In areas that are not native forest (see glossary), expansion into
native habitat only occurs according to one of the following two options:
Option 1. Official land-use maps such as ecological-economic zoning are
used and expansion only occurs in areas designated for expansion by the zoning.
If there are no official land use maps then maps produced by the government
under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) are used, and expansion only
occurs outside priority areas for conservation shown on these maps.
Option 2. An High Conservation Value Area (HCVA) assessment is undertaken
prior to clearing and there is no conversion of High Conservation Value Areas.
Note: Where neither official land use maps nor CBD maps exist, Option 2
must be followed.
4.4.2 There is no conversion of land where there is an unresolved land
use claim by traditional land users under litigation, without the agreement of
both parties.
4.5 On-farm biodiversity is maintained and safeguarded through the
preservation of native vegetation.
4.5.1 There is a map of the farm which shows the native vegetation.
4.5.2 There is a plan, which is being implemented, to ensure that the
native vegetation is being maintained (except areas covered under Criterion
4.4)
4.5.3 No hunting of rare, threatened or endangered species takes place on
the property.
Principle
5: Good Agricultural Practice
5.2 Natural vegetation areas around springs and along natural
watercourses are maintained or re-established.5.2.1 The location of all
watercourses has been identified and mapped, including the status of the
riparian vegetation.
5.2.2 Where natural vegetation in riparian areas has been removed there
is a plan with a timetable for restoration which is being implemented.
5.2.3 Natural wetlands are not drained and native vegetation is
maintained.
No comments:
Post a Comment