Farming for Nature: the role of Results-Based Payments
A new book published by Teagasc and the National Parks and Wildlife
Service (NPWS) (www.teagasc.ie/farmingfornature) highlights several Irish case
studies of results-based payments for biodiversity conservation.
Results-based
payments provide farmers with performance-related payments for delivering
agreed environmental objectives. For example, higher payments are made for
protection of indicator species, and for improved habitat quality, soil health
and water quality.
Teagasc has been involved in multiple projects that have trialled the
implementation of results-based payments: BurrenLIFE, which led to the Burren
Programme; KerryLIFE; AranLIFE; and, the RBAPS project (Developing Results
Based Agri-environmental Payment Schemes in Ireland and Spain). Across Europe,
policymakers and practitioners are looking to Ireland as a leader in this area,
and at these projects and programmes as examples of how results-based
approaches can be developed and implemented.
Lessons from these projects have informed the design of ambitious
results-based European Innovation Partnerships (EIPs) that include the Hen
Harrier Project, the Pearl Mussel Project, the BRIDE project, and others. These
lessons centred on:
- the necessity for combining the specialist
skills of farmers, ecologists, advisors and project managers
- the need to identify relevant specific
objectives and indicators that help to best target efforts;
- the important role of advisory support with
biodiversity expertise to engage with participant farmers;
- good practice in the development of scoring
schemes;
- innovative approaches to link scores to
payments;
- different hybrid approaches that combine
action-based payments, results-based payments and non-productive investments;
and,
- an ability to rapidly measure progress towards
the biodiversity targets, and either confirm progress or learn how to improve.
The book published by Teagasc and the National Parks and Wildlife
Service (NPWS) (www.teagasc.ie/farmingfornature) provides details on farm
plans, scoring sheets, governance mechanisms, the role of advisory services,
the choice of indicators, monitoring details, and explores the relationship
between results and payment.
Other contributors and collaborators: The Burren Programme, AranLIFE,
KerryLIFE, the NPWS, the Department of Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht, the
RBAPS project, Galway-Mayo Institute of Technology, and University College
Cork.
No comments:
Post a Comment